On South Korea's demographics and modernity

While I don't agree with the crux of the headline, this article has some interesting stat: Why feminists should fear a declining birth rate. This paragraph, in particular, stands out:

'The existential threat to South Korea is more urgent than for most countries. With a total fertility rate of 0.78, South Korea’s current population of 51 million will likely decline to just 15 million by 2100.⁠ Meanwhile the North Korean population of 26 million is expected to drop only slightly to 23 million. In other words, South Korea’s much poorer, much more authoritarian neighbour is currently half its population size — but, within the lifetimes of babies being born in Korea today, that balance will be upturned.'

Japan, Taiwan, and the other more developed East Asian nations seem to have the same problem. They don't have the same issues that I feel are a big reason for the West's declining birthrate (the world wars and decline of traditional values and religion), so I suspect a combination of feminism (as the article says 'a lot of girls realize that they don’t really have to do this anymore'), males addiction to video games and porn, plus decadence due to increasing wealth in combination are causing this. The article ends  with a question and an answer:

The question we have yet to answer is whether it is possible in the long term to sustain the kind of affluent, urban, secular culture represented by South Korea, or whether we will always revert back to the poverty, parochialism, and rigid control of women that characterised most of human history. In other words, is it possible to be modern and fertile? So far, the answer appears to be ‘no’. 

Indeed

Comments

Popular Posts

On covid-19 death statistics

On what if scenarios: London goes boom!

On murder stats