On climate doom-mongering

A very good article at the Washington Post: An Obama scientist debunks the climate doom-mongers 

Key quote:

 “If we stop emitting CO2 today, it would still be there in the atmosphere for hundreds of years” he tells me. “If we manage to reduce emissions a little bit, it’ll just accumulate at a slower rate but it’ll still go up.” Even that is hard to do at an acceptable economic cost.

True, as is this:

Climate change “will be gradual, and human ingenuity will certainly get us through this, if not allow us to prosper.” Indeed, Koonin notes there are advantages to a changing climate, such as the greening of the planet through increased vegetation, which he believes will dramatically increase the food supply for the world’s population. “So, this is not at all an unmitigated disaster as people would have you believe,” he says. “We’ll learn to take advantage of whatever changes happen rather than simply tolerate them. That’s what humans do, and we’re pretty good at it. 

Yes, it has been many years (just looked- 20!) since Bjorn Lomborg's The Skeptical Environmentalist made these points, sadly the doom-mongers still dominate headlines and the narrative. 

Comments

Popular Posts

On covid-19 death statistics

On what if scenarios: London goes boom!

On murder stats