On the 2020 US election

This post is a good summary of the impossibility of knowing for sure what did and didn't happen. Money quote:

"the same lax procedures that enable fraud in the first place also make it more or less impossible to prove after the fact. Sixty-nine million mail-in votes were cast; how many were fakes, and which ones? There is really no way to tell. Once those votes have been counted (sometimes in the absence of Republican poll-watchers, illegally excluded by Democrats from the rooms where counting was going on), there is no way to identify which ones were illegal and pull them out of the vote totals."

Regarding the statistical anomalies mentioned, This post (and this earlier one by the same author) and the comments gave some interesting insights and points over the so-called debunking of the fraud claims. 

As for my view, I have stated before that it is worth remembering that in  2016 Trump lost the popular vote but won the EC by flipping Pennsylvania, Michigan, and Wisconsin, partly due to Clinton taking them for granted (and not even campaigning in WI IIRC).

So, given the small margins involved, the anti-Trump factor and Dem's get out the vote campaign to avoid that happening again I think it is possible that he could have won fairly, but I still have questions on the legitimacy of the win due to the many many red flags, the refusal to investigate and the shutting down of any dissenting views. 

Nevertheless is it too late (and has been since it was called) for the result to be changed, despite what some claim. As for trying to improve the process for future elections, good luck with that!  

Comments

Popular Posts

On covid-19 death statistics

On what if scenarios: London goes boom!

On murder stats